Kimi no Na wa - Your Name
1080p: https://nyaa.si/view/944631
Original: matt
Video- Codec: H265
Encoder: x265
Resolution: 1280x720
Framerate: 60
Audio- Codec: AAC (Stereo and 5.1)
Language: Japanese
Subtitles - English (Original, Mites, Nii-Sama)
Re-encoded to 60 fps.
Added a extra custom subtitle using subtitle edit OCR (didn’t check it for bugs)
Added subtitles of Nii-sama.
Re-encoded video from 1920x1080 - h264 @ 23,976 fps to 1280x720 - h265 @ 60fps.
original file size: 24,90GB
remake file size: 1,42GB
File list
[Mites] Kimi no Na wa - Your Name [BD] [720p, 60fps, H265, AAC].mkv (1.4 GiB)
@PannenkoekenNL
Because a lot of scenes (example: falling meteorite scene) in the movie are moving and look bad because it was moving so fast.(stutter) (some people don't notice that) and I like 60fps anime in general.
The scene with the meteorite is intentionally filmed that way. If the animators wished to remove the camera turbulence, they most definitely would have.
I do appreciate the uploads by everyone such as yourself, so thank you. But, professionally speaking, Shinkai is very detail oriented, and goes over the shots carefully. He intended it to look that way.
My point is, why would you not encode to 24fps? It would reduce the file size significantly and if people wanted 60FPS+ that badly then they could use SVP.
@Astral SVP is broken trash :), and I'm a mainly upload 60fps videos because I re-encode them for myself. I guess I can make 24fps version too, if people want that.
If it's between SVP and a pre-encode, it's nice for users with worse computers to have the encode, since SVP is demanding. But users with worse computers will probably struggle to play 60fps HEVC, so this release seems to be working against itself.
@Mites, I don't see the need for it, but, everyone has their personal preferences. You are entitled to like things the way you like them and I understand your point of view. Thank you again for the upload.
@motbob Media classic player should solve that problem, so even toasters can play it (mobile phone users maybe not if they don't support h265). I'm not going to use h264 mainly because of the filesize.
@Mites, although H.265 might have more potential than H.264 in the long run, the best encoders we have right now (x264 and x265) aren't much different in efficiency.
@motbob It's true h265 requires a lot of compute power hence why it's not efficient. But I've enough compute power to do it.
I tested x264 and x265 with the original movie 24,90gb: x264: 3,04gb and x265: 1,38gb.
lmao 60 fps why the fuck do people do this shit to animation and live action films
it's fucking distracting and makes the film or show look cheap as if it's some afternoon soap
Thanks @MITES ?, I've watched the MKVCAGE/MC release and I want to watch it again--this time your release. Do you think it would be better than MC release--both the video and audio? And DO upload your release anyway, we love 'em! ??????
Comments - 31
bensaccountc
PannenkoekenNL
Mites (uploader)
Grendel
RacistPenguin
Grendel
Astral
Grendel
Mites (uploader)
Astral
Mites (uploader)
Mites (uploader)
Astral
motbob
motbob
slepinir
Grendel
CheekyKoala
Mites (uploader)
motbob
Mites (uploader)
Bl4Cc4t
polnar
bensaccountc
zetsu_shoren
fapper
ThatGuyWithTheLegwearFetish
Gunshi
JagatNaruto
Anshim
Mites (uploader)